ADVOCACY

OPPOSE AB 1796

Protect Consumers • Preserve Competition • Support California’s Interior Design Profession

WHAT IS AB 1796?

AB 1796 proposes a major restructuring of how commercial interior design is regulated in California. It would require interior designers to obtain a new state license in order to continue performing commercial work they have safely delivered for decades.

This legislation affects more than 8,500 practicing interior designers statewide, including certified and uncertified professionals, association members, and independent practitioners.

THE CORE ISSUE: NO DEMONSTRATED PUBLIC HARM

For decades, interior designers in California have:

  • Designed commercial interior environments in compliance with the California Building Code
  • Worked in coordination with architects, engineers, contractors, and building officials
  • Contributed to safe, functional, and code compliant commercial spaces

There has been no documented pattern of consumer health, safety, or welfare harm that would justify this expansion of licensure and enforcement.

Regulatory expansion should address a proven problem. No such evidence has been presented.

AB 1796 DOES NOT IMPROIVE PUBLIC PROTECTION

AB 1796 layers a new licensing structure over work that is already safely performed and regulated.

The bill would:

  • Require interior designers to obtain a new state license to continue commercial work
  • Impose a more restrictive scope of practice
  • Introduce additional regulatory costs and compliance burdens
  • Potentially expose professionals to enforcement penalties

There is no evidence these changes will improve public safety outcomes.

ECONOMIC AND CONSUMER IMPACT

Interior designers are small business owners, independent practitioners, and contributors to California’s commercial economy.

AB 1796 will:

  • Increase licensing and compliance costs
  • Reduce competition in the marketplace
  • Create regulatory uncertainty
  • Increase project costs for consumers

Higher regulatory costs ultimately impact clients, tenants, and businesses.

THE BOTTOM LINE

AB 1796 expands regulation without demonstrated public safety need.

It increases costs, reduces competition, and disrupts a profession that has served California’s commercial built environment for generations.

TAKE ACTION

We urge industry partners, business organizations, and consumer advocates to oppose AB 1796.

LEGISLATIVE BILL REPORT

Check back regularly for updates.

WE OPPOSE THE BIFURCATION OF INTERIOR DESIGN INTO COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PRACTICE AREAS

California has nearly 8,400 interior designers. We oppose "misguided" legislation, backed by large corporations, that would split the profession into "commercial" and "residential" categories.

This move would give large firms an unfair advantage and could nullify the certifications of over 1,600 CCIDC designers, hurting small businesses. We believe interior design is a distinct profession that must remain independent from architecture.

we support the title act that is currently in place in california

Business and Professions Code – Section 5800 – 5812

The California Council for Interior Design Certification is authorized and mandated by the Business and Professions Code (5800-5812) to certify interior designers in California.

THERE IS NO PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED

California’s building codes are the strictest in the nation, so there is no problem to solve. The IDEX California Exam is the gold standard because it is the only one that tests for these specific standards (Title 24).

Claims that California interior designers cannot work independently or stamp drawings are false. Certified Interior Designers (CIDs) already pull permits for non-structural work using their CCIDC stamp. While national exams are great for specialty expertise, they are not enough to ensure safe practice in California.

we support the title act that is currently in place in california

Business and Professions Code – Section 5800 – 5812

The California Council For Interior Design Certification is authorized and mandated by the Business and Professions Code (5800-5812) to certify interior designers in California.

THERE IS NO PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED

Every building, whether residential or commercial, is code-regulated. In fact, California has its own building code, which is more stringent than any other state.

CCIDC'S IDEX CALIFORNIA EXAM is the GOLDEN STANDARD, as it is the only interior design examination that tests on the California Building Code (Title 24). This examination is written in conjunction with the International Code Council (ICC) and nationally recognized psychometricians.

This international industry association has claimed that California's interior designers are not currently able to stamp their own drawings for commercial projects and practice independently of architects. This is false. CCIDC Certified Interior Designers (CID's) regularly pull permits for non-structural, non-seismic work with their CCIDC stamp. The CCIDC already has a commercial specialty examination for those who wish to prove their knowledge of the California Building Code (Title 24) for commercial projects.

We robustly support interior designers taking specialty examinations from national industry associations as they gain expertise in their careers, but these specialty exams are not sufficient for practice in California.

tIMELINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN LEGISLATION IN CALIFORNIA

our commitment to all interior designers in california

Our highest priority is protecting public health and safety by ensuring all California interior designers have fair access to the profession. We oppose any legislation that weakens the industry, creates unfair barriers, or subordinates designers to other professions.

We support an inclusive approach that represents everyone from independent business owners to Certified Interior Designers. Through collaboration and advocacy, we work to ensure that qualified professionals can continue to practice independently and to the full extent of the law.

What is the SUNSET REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE california council for interior design certificaton?

Every year, the Assembly Business and Professions Committee and the Senate Business, Professions, and Economic Development Committee hold joint sunset review hearings to look at how the boards and bureaus within the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) are performing. These boards and bureaus are responsible for protecting consumers and the public by overseeing the professionals they license.

The sunset review process gives the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA), the Legislature, and interested stakeholders a regular chance to review each board’s performance, discuss what’s working well, and suggest ways to improve. This review happens on a four-year cycle and was established by SB 2036 (McCorquodale, Chapter 908, Statutes of 1994) to ensure ongoing accountability and consumer protection.

Below are links to past Sunset Review Reports:

Senate Bill 816 Extends CCIDC Sunset Date to 2027

2022 Sunset Review Hearing Video

2022 CCIDC Sunset Review Report

Senate Bill 547 Extends CCIDC Sunset Date to 2022

2017 Sunset Review Hearing Video

2017 CCIDC Sunset Review Report

2012 CCIDC Sunset Review Report